Free Equals Nothing in the Services Industry So Long Boston, Hello Sydney
Dec 23

Here’s a thought:  What if IBM made a bold move and decided to drop all storage OEM products and take a market position centered on XIV?

After shockers in 2001 when IBM ditched the disk manufacturing business, sold the kit and kaboodle to HDS, IBM ventured into a variety of OEM relationships with LSI, NetApp, and HDS (disk) to recompile the mid-range, NAS, and tier-1 storage line-up respectively.  Things like SVC (San Volume  Controller) are still in the mix and strategic, but only with the acquisition of XIV did IBM really change-up the game and their market position.

Here’s why IBM should consider an XIV centric strategy:

  • There is a massive industry shift to reduce tier 1 storage dependency
  • Commodity storage is the center of the market, and tier 2 storage is dominating the landscape (block, file, backup targets, etc.)
  • Leverage NTAP gateways and deduplication feature-set for file data
  • Position as a T1 alternative and T2 mainstay, versus being all things to all consumers

I have to agree with a lot of Moshe’s statements, that the storage industry hasn’t exactly cracked the code of commodity storage in the last 10 years.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook

Leave a Reply

preload preload preload